Blockchain News

Exploring a blockchain conundrum: Is current regulation unable to keep up with advances in tech?

It’s an age-old issue – the wheels of the legislative process move
at a glacial pace. By the time a cogent and coherent framework has been issued
and subsequently understood by the masses, it’s already rapidly becoming
obsolete. Consider, for instance, the GDPR, only recently brought into law in
Europe: prior to its existence, collection, storage and holding of data was
governed by archaic regulation such as the UK’s 1998 Data Protection Act.

As systems and infrastructures evolve, it’s of critical importance
that regulators not only understand the changes, but provide clarification to
ensure individuals and businesses stay on the right side of the law. In the
absence of the creation of new laws, it’s critical that guidance that
interprets new technology in light of old legislation is issued.

Recent concerns have sparked over the emergence and proliferation
of cryptocurrencies – by any metric, these are poised to cause significant
disruption to existing infrastructures in personal wealth / business operations.
With the UK government recently criticised
for its failure to adapt to digital advances
, many are confused as to what the future will
hold, not only for their investments into the nascent asset class, but as to
taxes in the digital realm as a whole (Phillip Hammond recently hinted at plans
by the treasury to implement a ‘digital
services tax’

Such regulations, if adopted, would increase the tax collected
from tech giants such as Amazon. In a society that’s slowly but surely migrating into a digital era,
it’s imperative to ensure that innovation can proceed unhindered, with sensible
handling of the tax laws that govern this new paradigm. Hammond’s intimation
that such regulations should be crafted in such a way so as to not disadvantage
smaller businesses should not be taken lightly if they’re to grow on a global

This is a particularly prominent concern amongst tech businesses
in Europe – from big data to AI, governments have repeatedly failed to advise
on how new developments fit into the existing framework. Many businesses
involved in accepting, investing in and mining digital currencies have
complained about this – though the UK was one of the first European nations to
issue tax guidance on cryptocurrencies in 2014
, it has since lagged behind
others, resulting in blockchain businesses migrating towards much more
welcoming and less restrictive jurisdictions such as Malta, Switzerland, or
Singapore. It goes without saying that the landscape is vastly different to
what it was four years ago.

Creating an interoperable cryptocurrency framework should be a
high priority for all European countries, especially if they wish to
successfully hamper tax evasion, money laundering or other illicit activities
(and, of course, foster a burgeoning industry). For all intents and purposes,
it seems that very little has been done to truly address some of the European
Central Bank’s Virtual Currency Schemes’ uncertainties
around law

since its publication in 2012, although a Swedish
2015 classifies cryptocurrency as currency for tax purposes.

It’s not good enough that events like initial coin offerings are
being dealt with on a case-by-case basis (especially considering their rapid
proliferation and appeal). It may have worked when they were few, but this
model is not scalable, and leaves a lot of investors in the dark. A UK
task force

has been assembled to put an end to this, but it remains to be seen whether
this will yield any clarity, and whether they can establish a general purpose
set of easily-understandable criteria for ICO-launching startups and their
investors alike.

Overall, this lack of certainty is posing an obstacle to the flow
of funds into the rapidly-growing space. At the moment, many concerns appear to
stem from the difficulties of tying virtual currencies to specific users (and
the implication this has on criminal activity), though the most recent

to the the 4th AML Directive has attempted to make cryptocurrencies compatible
with existing AML regulations.

Regulation must be flexible, consistent and perhaps most importantly, forward-looking, so as to compensate for technological advances that seem to be growing at an exponential rate. As we enter this new paradigm, it’s crucial that developers, businesses, entrepreneurs and users are aware of their liabilities and rights in order to continue to thrive.

About the authors: Sean Ryan and Perry Woodin, are the Founders of NODE40. NODE40 Balance is a robust cryptocurrency reporting software that integrates directly with major cryptocurrency exchanges. Members of the blockchain community transacting in, trading, or mining digital currency, have likely triggered a taxable event and can be unaware of how to properly disclose these transactions to the government.

Interested in hearing leading global brands discuss subjects like this in person? Find out more at the Blockchain Expo World Series, Global, Europe and North America.

The post Exploring a blockchain conundrum: Is current regulation unable to keep up with advances in tech? appeared first on The Block.

Read the original post: Exploring a blockchain conundrum: Is current regulation unable to keep up with advances in tech?